2. Authors should retain their unprocessed data and metadata files, as editors may request them to aid in manuscript evaluation. wiley manuscript status under consideration. Despite being a widespread ailment, no permanent solution exists to address this oral condition. Don't worry about all these. Although using pure CBD does not result in THC-like intoxication, it is not risk-free. So the typical time of getting back the first review is around 1-2 months, depending on the journal. As part of the journal's commitment to supporting authors at every step of the publishing process, the journal requires the submitting author (only) to provide an ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Authors: Names, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses for all authors, including designation of at least one as corresponding author. the CONSORT Statement for reporting randomized trials), The health and safety of all participants in the study was not compromised, They should start by describing in simple terms what the data show, They should make reference to statistical analyses, such as significance or goodness of fit, Once described, they should evaluate the trends observed and explain the significance of the results to wider understanding. The manuscript shall be rejected. In this case, you may wish to familiarize yourself with examples of other reviews done for the journal, which the editor should be able to provide or, as you gain experience, rely on your own evolving style. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. 1. Where research is not replicable, the paper should be recommended for rejection. Have they cited all the relevant work that would contradict their thinking and addressed it appropriately? The Second Read-Through: Section by Section Guidance, Criticisms & Confidential Comments to Editors. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. About the Journal. of my. Manuscript Types Type Abstract Length Format Tables/figu res/boxes Illustrations Useful reference Original Article Structured; up to words Up to 1500 words Up to 10 references, Vancouver You should also try to be objective and constructive, not subjective and destructive. This could help them with future submissions. Macular folds definition 4 . Aims and Scope. Certain patterns of good reporting need to be followed by the author: Discussion should always, at some point, gather all the information together into a single whole. Work with existing files: Easily upload from and export to your favorite file formatManuscripts converts the files accurately and instantly. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Built for Open Science: Incorporateand interact withthe data and code supporting your research, and integrate with your Jupyter lab notebook. Macular folds definition 4 . In particular, bear in mind that some journals will not want the recommendation included in any comments to authors, as this can cause editors difficulty later - see Section 11 for more advice about working with editors. 2002 ]]> My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to under review last three days ago. A study on the rooting of O. lanceolata stem cuttings was conducted using a low-cost technology employed in commercial rooting stem cuttings of tea . Can anyone suggest any reason behind it? on 18 Mar, 2019, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Accepted Author's Manuscript (AAM). I dont know my answer satisfied you or not. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. Currently I am working on a project wherein I need to predict the estimated new Selling price of IPL players based on their current base price and previous years' performance & sold price. The domestication of O. lanceolata is hampered by erratic and unreliable supply of seeds. Both are very repetitive indexing agencies. This might be related to the internal administrative structure of the journal. Try to answer all the questions. This should state the main question addressed by the research and summarize the goals, approaches, and conclusions of the paper. How can this be corrected? I would like to know how to calculate the thermodynamics of such a system. So in the spirit of fairness, write comments to editors as though authors might read them too. Crypto Futures Funding Rates, Desired objectives must include consideration of what the endpoint of de-extinction should be. Editors say, "If a manuscript has many English language and editing issues, please do not try and fix it. All rights reserved. Please click here for more details on our position. How To Communicate With The Journal? One of my manuscripts is there for nearly 4 months. The detailed read-through should take no more than an hour for the moderately experienced reviewer. [CDATA[> The immunization status of children is dependent on the dynamics of vaccination uptake which is complex and involves the interplay of different associated factors. However, if the status has been showing "under consideration" for a long time, there is a possibility that the editor is trying to find peer reviewers for the paper. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. An open peer review status timeline is displayed on the preprint, and updated in real-time while the manuscript is under consideration. It's only a month, and why would you withdraw a paper! Are citations excessive, limited, or biased? How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Peer reviewers now assess the study and provide their comments. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. Usually the status "Under review" indicates that the paper has cleared the admin check and it has been sent to the external peer reviewer or in-house section editor. PIs gone AWOL? If you don't, make a note now that you need to feedback on how to improve those sections. Once at a time. Exposure of dentin tubules due to loss of protective enamel (crown) and cementum (root) tissues as a result of erosion, mechanical wear, gingival recession, etc. Other journals are publishing the similar research. There are sufficient data. [CDATA[> Manuscripts - Focus on your content, not on formatting it. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. and B.E. Give positive feedback first. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? I know a Nature journal when I see one. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a popular tool used by psychologists working as managers' coaches in organizational contexts. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? 1, 2 As a consequence, there is an urgent need for therapies that could delay or disrupt the progression to dementia. What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material? drafted the initial manuscript, revised and finalised the content. It has been like that for a few days without any email notification. Experiments gone wrong? Even if you are coming to the opinion that an article has serious flaws, make sure you read the whole paper. The manuscript does not fall within the Aims and Scope of the journal: The work is not of interest to the readers of the specific journal. Marnett, Cohen, Fukushima, Gooderham, Hecht, Rietjens, and Smith interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript.